Tunisia: Greater presidential powers threaten rights and freedoms

Tunisia: Greater presidential powers threaten rights and freedoms - Civic Space

Police control on Avenue Bourguiba, Tunis. Photograph: Luis_Martinez/ Shutterstock

ARTICLE 19 condemns a new decree granting Tunisian president Kais Saied power over the three branches of government as it poses a serious threat to human rights and will thwart democratic reform in the country.

The Presidential Decree[1], issued on 22 September 2021,is part of a set of exceptional measures to tackle instability in the country, including ongoing protests two months on from the suspension of parliament and the dismissal of the prime minister.

On 25 July 2021, the president declared a “state of exception” based on  the provisions of Article 80 of the Constitution, yet it effectively abolishes the current constitution, dismantling the separation of powers. The new decree dismantles the power of the legislative, allowing the President to legislate directly, bypassing the Assembly of the People’s Representatives without appropriate accountability, while it grants the President oversight over the judiciary. 

ARTICLE 19 is also alarmed that although the powers the decree grants are stated as temporary, no time limit has been specified, increasing the ambiguity of the process and prompting fears about its consequences.

The decree allows for continued suspension of the Assembly of the People’s Representatives, lifting deputies’ immunity so that they can face prosecution and introducing a procedure that will block salary payments to the assembly chairman and other members. Also, pursuant to Article 4, the President of the Republic has been empowered to enact decree-laws impacting 29 areas of the Parliament’s competence, including the regulation of the judiciary, elections, media and the press. Moreover, decree-laws issued by the President are immune from all judicial oversight in accordance with Article 7.

The overarching executive authority means the President of the Government has been stripped of most of his powers, turning him into a mere assistant to the President of the Republic, who is responsible for appointing members of the government, controls its programs and sets its priorities. Instead of reporting to Parliament, the government now reports to the President of the Republic, who can now revoke one or more of its members.

The Presidential Decree also effectively abolishes the current constitution, despite its stipulation that the preamble of the constitution will continue to be applied, along with the first and second chapters of the constitution, which relate to general principles, rights and freedoms and all constitutional provisions that do not conflict with the exceptional measures enshrined in the Presidential Decree.

Finally, Article 22 stipulates the creation of a committee to assist the President of the Republic in drafting amendments related to political reforms.

Overhauling the constitution and violating key principles

We note, first, that this Presidential Decree contradicts the provisions of Article 80 of the Constitution, which stipulates that the measures taken by the President of the Republic must be temporary and should solely be implemented in order to confront imminent danger. In practice, the measures that have been announced will be permanent, such as the abolition of the temporary commission overseeing draft laws and ensuring they adhere to the constitution, changes to the electoral law, and the creation of a new committee to draft amendments to the constitution.

The President of the Republic assigned himself the powers of legislative authority, which authorises him to issue decree-laws pertaining to various aspects of society, such as political parties, associations, organisations, constitutional authorities, and the implementation of justice, elections, media, and human rights. Article 7 also made these decree-laws immune to judicial oversight, which constitutes a flagrant violation of the principle of separation of powers. The principle requires that each authority be subject to the supervision of the other, and to Article 102 of the Constitution, which gives the judiciary responsibility to ensure the supremacy of the constitution, oversee all legal texts, and check the extent of compatibility with the constitution.

On the other hand, Article 22 of the Presidential Decree provided for the creation of a committee to draft constitutional amendments and legislative reforms specified by the President of the Republic. This confirms that the President singled out the political decision to institute unilateral reforms in the absence of Parliament and of any will to involve political and social forces and civil society organisations in formulating options that reflect the aspirations of all Tunisian people.

Democratic reform under threat

ARTICLE 19 warns against taking advantage of this exceptional circumstance and issuing decree-laws on political parties, associations, organisations and constitutional commissions, and the regulation of justice, elections, media and human rights in a unilateral manner, while Parliament is suspended and without the effective participation and consultation of the civil, social and political forces in the country. This is especially important since the constitutionality of these decree-laws cannot be challenged before the judiciary, which may constitute a deviation in power and a serious impediment to the possibility of any democratic reform in the country.

We also see that maintaining Chapter 2 of the Constitution, which relates to rights and freedoms, does not represent a real guarantee as long as the constitutional mechanisms to protect them have been frozen or suspended, since the President of the Republic can regulate freedoms through decree-laws that are not subject to judicial oversight, and since it is impossible for the Parliament to exercise political control over the executive authority because the functions of the Assembly of the People’s Representatives have been suspended. 

Of increasing concern is the targeting of individuals and groups who oppose President Kais Saied’s policies, a situation that has been exacerbated in recent weeks. These people have been defamed and insulted with total impunity, creating an atmosphere of intimidation that could result in individuals refraining from expressing their opinions freely and the absence of pluralism in Tunisian media.[2] Over the last two months, the media has largely avoided delving into political issues or broadcasting unbiased content in favour of the President of the Republic, a trend that will contribute to the decline of public debate and citizens’ participation in public affairs at a very delicate stage for the future of democracy and human rights in Tunisia.


In order to protect the democratic transition process in Tunisia, ARTICLE 19 recommends the following:

To the President of the Republic

  • To declare clearly when exactly the state of emergency will be lifted and the process for returning to democracy in accordance with the democratic principles of the Constitution.
  • To restore the competencies of the Assembly of the People’s representatives through snap legislative elections. 
  • To ensure the separation of the executive, legislative and judicial branches, in accordance with the Constitution, and avoid concentration of powers into one single person or instances depending on one single person.
  • To bring an end to unilateral policies and adopt a participatory approach that is open to all Tunisian people without any exclusion or discrimination.
  • To bring an end to unilateral policies and adopt a participatory approach that is open to all Tunisian people without any exclusion or discrimination.
  • To ensure the full respect of international human rights laws and standards, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights  (ICCPR), to which Tunisia is party.
  • To ensure that MPs and citizens are not prosecuted for expressing their opinions.
  • Any appointment of members of committees should be on the basis of competence and integrity in accordance with a participatory, pluralistic and transparent process.

To the Independent High Authority for Audio-visual Communication

  • Guarantee the media environment is balanced and ensure all political movements have access to the media.

To the media

  • Adhere to the ethics of the journalistic profession and uphold principles of objectivity and integrity when covering issues related to the current constitutional and political crisis.

To civil society organisations

  • Form a broad civil coalition to counter all retreat from the democratic process.
  • Continue to take an effective role in monitoring the government’s actions, spread the values ​​of a democratic society, and confront policies that infringe on rights and freedoms, as has been the practice since the beginning of the revolution in December 2010. 

[1] To read the Presidential Decree number 117 of 2021 dated 22 September 2021 and related to measures of exception, see here.

[2] To read the report of the High Authority for Audio-visual Communication related to political pluralism during the period following the president’s declaration of the state of exception, follow the link :



For press queries or to arrange an interview with one of ARTICLE 19’s experts, please email: press@article19.org