Today ARTICLE19 joins 16 organisations and more than 50 artists, journalists, and human rights defenders in calling on Facebook and Instagram to #StopSilencingPalestine. When human rights are stifled offline, their protection online is even more important.
“Social media is incredibly important to activists exposing human rights violations and building protest movements, and this is true in Palestine as it is elsewhere. So when companies like Facebook apply secret rules which unfairly impact those speaking out against abuses, it’s a serious problem for freedom of expression and other human rights.” said Saloua Ghazouani, Director of ARTICLE 19 MENA.
“Facebook needs to take action to address its failures and end the silencing of Palestinian activists online. We want to see much more transparency from the company on how and why its content decisions are being taken, and more cooperation with civil society on making sure rights are protected online.” she added.
On 13 May, The Intercept published Facebook’s internal policy on when to delete Facebook or Instagram posts containing the word “Zionist”. Their source said the policy has been in place since 2019, contrary to what the company claimed in meetings with civil society.
7amleh, the Arab Center for Social Media Advancement, just released a report called “The Attacks on Palestinian Digital Rights”, which documented more than 500 reports between 6 May and 19 May on such takedowns, marking an increase in attacks on Palestinian digital rights.
This is not just a “glitch” as the companies have been telling us. These are systemic problems that require immediate action.
Join the campaign at stopsilencingpalestine.com to demand Facebook takes action, through:
- Public Audit: A full, independent, public audit of content moderation policies with respect to Israel and Palestine and a commitment to co-design policies and tools that address deficiencies or overreach of content moderation found during the audit. Furthermore, rules should be based on existing human rights frameworks and must be applied consistently across jurisdictions.
- Government request transparency: Complete transparency on requests—both legal and voluntary—submitted by the Israeli government and Cyber Unit, including number of requests, type of content enforcement; and data regarding compliance with such requests. Users should also be able to appeal content decisions.
- Automation transparency: Transparency with respect to where automation and machine learning algorithms are being used to moderate content related to Palestine, including error rates as well as classifiers used.
- “Dangerous individuals and organizations”: Transparency regarding any content guidelines or rules related to the classification and moderation of terrorism and extremism. Companies should, at minimum, publish any internal lists of groups and individuals classified as “dangerous”, “terrorist” or “extremist.” Users cannot adhere to rules that are not made public.
- Commitment to co-design: Commitment to a co-design process with civil society to improve upon policies and processes involving Palestinian content.